| ||||||
|
|
sponsored by the Volkswagen Foundation
Cooperative
Research Project “Governance
and Social Action in Conflict Societies” International Conference at the University of Juba Juba, Sudan July 21-24, 2008 Conflict Societies and Approaches
towards Sustainable Peace 'Conflict societies' face particular problems in maintaining
or establishing structures of governance that allow social groups to articulate
their interests, mediate their differences and exercise their legal rights and
obligations by peaceful means[1].
Frequently peace agreements that settle a major conflict such as a civil war or
recurrent violent clashes within a society, turn out to be fragile or
insufficient to tackle deeply entrenched societal conflicts beyond the main
conflict properly. In some cases a peace agreement may drive other marginalised
social groups to take up arms in order to make their demands stronger and put
pressure on the negotiating warring parties towards inclusion in agreements on
power and wealth sharing[2].
Moreover, in many cases unresolved resource conflicts re-emerge as soon as the
main conflict has been worked out[3].
Scholars and practitioners agree that, in order to avoid such
unintended outcomes, existing and new institutions and an extended scope for
social action are needed to make it possible for social groups to deal
appropriately with the root causes of conflict and the complex conflict dynamics
that usually have evolved over time. Tensions arising from mass return of
internally displaced people and refugees to communities that are still slowly
recovering from war may become entry points for renewed violent conflict.
Involvement of the various levels of government, inclusion of all relevant
actors and stakeholders that carry on the conflict or are affected by it, their
participation in decision-making as well as their ownership of the
implementation of decisions are crucial for successful conflict transformation
that tackles direct, cultural and structural violence[4].
In sum, sustainable political solutions for societies which have experienced
long-term severe conflict will consist in extended participation, fair political
representation and a leadership that is accountable to society[5].
A change in state-society relations towards inclusive strategies of consultation
and problem solution in informal and relations-oriented ways is expected to
promote conditions that facilitate cooperation towards human security[6].
This change might build on established local ways of conflict resolution which
however need to add a dimension of removing oppressive social and gender
relations through non-violent social action. For
the conference in Juba, case studies which provide insight in social action and
the dynamics of conflict societies in the above sense and analyse current
attempts of building governance structures are invited. However, the following
aspects should also be considered and included in the analysis. The
Dilemma of Simultaneous Economic and Political Transformation and the Risks of
Contested Governance Simultaneous
economic and political transformation[7] adds to the particular difficulties conflict societies are facing in
processes of establishing adequate governance structures. Solutions which are
currently promoted by development agencies tend to apply 'technical
fixes'[8]
and mechanistic concepts of 'good governance'. Within a neo-institutionalist
framework, attempts are made to establish rule of law, efficient and
effective public sector management, accountability of public office,
decentralisation, public availability of information and transparency. Aims are
better service delivery, poverty reduction, prevention of corruption and an
attractive environment for investors[9].
Many aid agencies also embark on measures to increase respect for human rights
and democratic participation through capacity building of civil society and the
judiciary[10]. In line with western
liberal thought, the proponents of this approach regard civil society
organisations as crucial to manage and control resources and to create social
cohesion[11]. Empirical
evidence shows, however, that hese approaches are hardly able to solve the
complex political-economic problems of transforming conflict societies. The
blueprint approach of 'good governance' and 'promoting civil society' may
eclipse competing concepts and structures of governance, alternative approaches
of operation, interactions between social groups and leaders, ways to create
legitimacy and the existing variety of decision-making procedures. In countries
where aid agencies have carried out humanitarian work, provided infrastructure
and basic social services in the war zones for a long time, governance appears
to be contested between
powerful aid agencies and the re-emerging state authorities. This may contribute
to the establishment of weak states[12]. The Sub-regional Context A further important aspect to be considered in the conference
papers is the sub-regional and international dimension conflict societies are
part of. The sub-regional context consists more often than not of more conflict
societies and conflict parties that have allies in neighbouring countries.
International interests and increasingly, economic interests of global players
lead to an even higher complexity of conflicts. Consequently, the relevant
sub-regional and international stakeholders should be involved and issues to be
addressed in peace negotiations. Attempts of building sub-regional governance
have hardly been made so far, more common have been interventions by
international peace-keeping forces, however with limited success. The proposed international conference intends to look into
the (re-) establishment of governance structures in conflict societies and
social action from the highly differentiated perspective indicated above. Proposed Issues for Conference Papers Questions that could be addressed are, for example: l
How do economic
aspects, such as the long-term implications of
structural adjustment programmes, neo-liberal economic policies, or
long-term intervention of aid agencies impact on governance and social action in
conflict societies? l
How is the
political economy related to governance and social action in conflict societies? l
Which effects do
sub-regional political economies and international strategic interests have on
governance and social action in particular country cases? l
Which
impact do entrenched resource conflicts, the proliferation of arms and in
general, 'markets of violence'[13]
have on governance and social action? l
How
are internally displaced people and refugees re-integrated in conflict societies?
Which governance structures are formed in order to organise this process and
settle newly emerging conflicts between local and returning groups? And on
the other hand, l
How do currently
existing governance patterns and social action impact on the main economically
driven conflicts in a given society? The
conference papers are also expected to contribute constructively to the academic
discourse on state decay and societal erosion. Related questions to be addressed
are the following: l
How are
state-society relations being transformed in the framework of existing and new
local and sub-regional governance structures in societies that have been caught
up or that have taken part in violent conflicts for a long time? l
Which attempts are
being made to tackle the root causes of conflict – in institutional terms as
well as in terms of changing social, gender and power relations? How are
mechanisms included that deal with underlying conflicts about resources such as
land, water, oil, etc.? l
Which actors are
involved and which activities are related to building governance, creating
legitimacy of rule, re-establishing old and forming new institutions that guide
and shape state-society relations? Which alternative activities can be
identified that undermine or demolish governance structures? l
How are civil
societies in conflict societies characterised, and which dynamics are shaping
these civil societies? Which factors inform, trigger and guide social action of
various civil society groups? Which roles do they have in governance? Which
activities do civil societies undertake in conflict societies? l
Which links exist
or emerge between the local and national levels of governance and social action?
Which political dynamics do local, regional, national, sub-regional and
international actors create in conflict societies? These
questions are not exhaustive, papers may address other aspects and analyse
governance and social action in conflict societies also from different
perspectives than those suggested here. Juba
University as a Conference Site Sudan
is an example of a conflict society which is currently dealing with nearly all
the difficulties mentioned above. South Sudan in particular is still recovering
from the long civil war that was raging in large parts of its territory. Juba,
the capital of South Sudan, is the centre of re-building governance in this
devastated area. The local society, the Government of South Sudan and numerous
aid agencies are coping with huge social, economic and political challenges. The
University of Juba is in the process of being re-located from Khartoum, the
capital of Sudan, to its original site in Juba. Sudanese scholars welcome
opportunities for academic exchange after long years of isolation. During the
conference that will be hosted by the University of Juba, academics from other
parts of the world will have a unique opportunity to learn from Sudan and vice
versa. The local interested public, civil society groups, government officials
and staff of aid agencies will be invited to participate in this conference so
that a dialogue between academics and practitioners can take place. Formal
Requirements Abstracts of not more than 200 words should be sent to
the project coordinator Dr Elke Grawert (grawert@uni-bremen.de) before March 31, 2008.
The
selected presenters will receive an invitation letter by mid-April, 2008, which
they may use for official requirements (visa, leave, etc.). They have to raise
funds on their own to cover travel expenditure. We can only assist in finding
sponsors. The
preliminary programme will be distributed by e-mail in mid-April, 2008, too. The
presenters should send the complete papers
of about 15 pages length (font 12, Times Roman, 1.5 line spacing) by e-mail to
the coordinator before June 30, 2008. The
University of Juba will offer free accommodation for a number of participants in
the university guesthouses so that the cost of staying in Juba can be kept low
for those who cannot afford hotel expenses. Any
inquiries by e-mail to: The Cooperative Research Project
“Governance and Social Action in Sudan after the Peace Agreement of January 9,
2005: local, national and regional dimensions” This project includes partners from the Universities of Juba and Khartoum, Ahfad University for Women, Omdurman, University of Addis Ababa, University of Nairobi, Moi University, Eldoret and the University of Bremen. Thirteen researchers are doing their Masters and PhD studies in Sudan, Ethiopia and Kenya on the basis of scholarships by the Volkswagen Foundation. Scholars from the above universities supervise the research work and conduct own researches. The Juba Conference will conclude the first phase of the project, which had started in September 2005. It is meant to provide an opportunity for a broader public to discuss the research results produced by the project participants as well as presenters from other research contexts in comparative perspective. [1]
According to the definition of 'governance' by UNDP
- United Nations Development Programme (1997): Governance
for Sustainable Human Development, Policy Paper, in: http://mirror.undp.org/magnet/policy,
and UNDP (2006): Governance for
the Future. Democracy and Development in the Least Developed Countries, in: http://www.undp.org/governance/docs/Policy-Pub-LDCReport.pdf. [2]
For the case of Sudan, see Grawert, Elke/El-Battahani, Atta (2007):
Oil-cursed: the peace process in South Sudan, in: Development and
Cooperation, March: 110-113 & http://www.inwent.org/E+Z/content/archive-eng/03-2007/foc_art5.html. [3] See the contributions in Wohlmuth, Karl/Urban, Tino (eds) (2007): Reconstructing Economic Governance after Conflict in Resource-rich African Countries. Berlin: Lit Verlag. [4]
See Nhema, Alfred
G. (2004): The Quest for Peace in Africa. Utrecht; Senghaas, Dieter (2001):
The Civilization of Conflict: Constructive Pacifism as a Guiding Notion for
Conflict Transformation, in: Austin,
A. et al. op. cit.: 25-40, also in: http://www.berghof-handbook.net/uploads/download/senghaas_handbook.pdf. [5]
Omosa,
Mary/Katumanga, M. (2004): Leadership and the Politics of Nation State in
Kenya: Searching for a Vision, Balancing Interests and Navigating Realities.
UNESCO Chair, University of Nairobi. [6]
UNDP (1994): Human Development Report. New Dimensions of Human
Security, in: http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr1994/. [7]
Schmitter,
Philippe C. (1996): Dangers and Dilemmas of Democracy, in: Diamond,
Larry/Plattner, Marc F. (eds): The Global Resurgence of Democracy.
Baltimore: 76-93. [8]
Armijo, Leslie
Elliott/Biersteker, Thomas J./Lowenthal, Abraham F. (1995): The Problems of
Simultaneous Transitions, in: Diamond / Plattner (eds), op.cit.: 226-240. [9]
World Bank (2004): World Development Report: Making
Services Work for Poor People. Washington D.C. [10]
Commission of
the European Communities (2003): Governance and Development. Brussels,
in: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2003/com2003_0615en01.pdf. [11]
Diamond,
Larry J. (1994): Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation,
in: Journal of Democracy, Vol. 5 No. 3: 4-17. [12]
Riehl,
Volker (2001): Who is Ruling in South Sudan? The Role of NGOs in Rebuilding
Socio-political Order. Uppsala;
Grawert, Elke (2007): The
Aid Business in South Sudan after the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, in:
Bass, Hans-Heinrich et al. (eds): Economic Systems in a Changing World
Economy. Berlin / London / New Brunswick: Lit Verlag : 387-402. [13]
Elwert, Georg (1997): Gewaltmärkte. Beobachtungen zur
Zweckrationalität der Gewalt, in: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und
Sozialpsychologie, Special Issue No. 37. Opladen: 86-101. |
|
| |||||||||